On this picture from video, former Minneapolis police Officer Derek Chauvin listens as the decision is learn in his trial. (AFP)
- A photograph of Brandon Mitchell at an anti-racism rally carrying a t-shirt with an image of Martin Luther King Jr has surfaced.
- Mitchell is certainly one of solely two jurors who’ve publicly recognized themselves.
- He stated the photograph was taken a march he attended in August 2020.
The impartiality of a juror who convicted former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin of the homicide of George Floyd has come into query after a photograph surfaced of him at an anti-racism rally.
Authorized specialists stated Chauvin’s protection lawyer may probably use the photograph of juror Brandon Mitchell as grounds to attraction the decision.
Within the photograph Mitchell, a Black 31-year-old, is carrying a T-shirt with an image of civil rights chief Martin Luther King Jr on it and the phrases “Get Your Knee Off Our Necks” and the letters “BLM” for Black Lives Matter.
Chauvin, who was captured on video kneeling on Floyd’s neck for greater than 9 minutes, was convicted of homicide and manslaughter final month by a 12-member jury.
Mitchell is certainly one of solely two jurors who’ve publicly recognized themselves for the reason that high-profile trial.
In a questionnaire, potential jurors have been requested if that they had taken half in any of the protests towards police brutality which adopted Floyd’s 25 Might 2020 demise.
Mitchell stated he had not and will serve impartially. He instructed the Minneapolis Star Tribune that the photograph was taken at a march he attended in Washington in August 2020 to mark the anniversary of Martin Luther King’s well-known “I Have a Dream” speech.
Jeffrey Frederick, a jury choice skilled, stated Mitchell’s reply could also be “technically appropriate” for the reason that Washington occasion was billed as a commemoration.
“It will be as much as the choose to conduct questioning and to make a willpower as as to whether or not he felt that this juror was biased and, probably, had lied throughout the course of voir dire or on the juror questionnaire,” Frederick instructed AFP.
The choose would then determine whether or not it “reaches a regular for affecting the result of the trial,” he stated.
“The bar is excessive when it comes to misconduct and the granting of a brand new trial,” he added. “Such determinations are uncommon.”
Steve Tuller, one other jury choice skilled, agreed.
“Judges don’t need to declare mistrials, notably in a case the place there was a verdict and given the particular circumstances of this case,” Tuller stated.
“In the long run, I feel it is unlikely that the juror’s ‘revelation’ will change the decision.”
Chauvin is to be sentenced on 25 June and faces as much as 40 years in jail on probably the most severe cost – second-degree homicide.
Do you need to know extra about this matter? Sign up for one of News24’s 33 newsletters to obtain the knowledge you need in your inbox. Particular newsletters can be found to subscribers.